The Impact of Procedural Delays on Criminal Trials in Pakistan: Causes and Solutions
Keywords:
Criminal justice system, Alternative Dispute, Resolution (ADR), Accountability mechanisms, Accused, Adjournment investigationAbstract
The criminal justice system in Pakistan faces significant challenges due to procedural delays in criminal trials, which have far-reaching consequences for both the victims and the accused. These delays undermine the credibility of the judicial process, result in prolonged incarceration for the accused, and delay justice for victims, contributing to a loss of public trust in the system. The causes of these delays are multifaceted, including an overburdened court system, inefficient investigation processes, bureaucratic red tape, corruption, frequent adjournments, and a lack of legal awareness. These delays not only cause personal harm but also weaken the deterrent effect of the justice system, potentially encouraging further criminal activity. To address these issues, this article proposes several solutions, including increasing the number of judges and courts, improving investigation procedures, adopting technology for better case management, enhancing legal education and awareness, strengthening accountability mechanisms, and promoting alternative dispute resolution (ADR). By implementing these reforms, Pakistan can reduce procedural delays and ensure a more efficient, transparent, and fair criminal justice system.
References
Ali, S., & Alam, M. S. (2021). Psychological impacts of COVID-19 and delay on the administration of the criminal justice system: A comparative study of Pakistani and Indian jurisdictions. Journal of Asian and African Social Science and Humanities, 7(3), 1-21.
Ali, S., & Hassan, M. (2022). An evaluation of pending cases in the judiciary of Pakistan: Figures and statistics. Pakistan Social Science Review, 6(2), 592-602.
Dandurand, Y. (2014). Criminal justice reform and the system’s efficiency. Criminal Law Forum, 25, 383-440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-014-9235-y
Fabri, M., & Langbroek, P. M. (2003). Delay in judicial proceedings: A preliminary inquiry into the relation between the domains of the reasonable time requirement of article 6, 1 ECHR and their consequences for judges and judicial administration in the civil, criminal, and administrative justice chains. Preliminary draft report for the Council of Europe. Strasbourg: European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ).
Iqbal, N. A. (2009). A view from Pakistan human rights. American Bar Association, 36(1), 21-23.
Judicial Statistics and Figures. (2020). Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan.
Kappeler, V. E. (2012). What is the place of police within the criminal justice system? Retrieved from https://ekuonline.eku.edu/blog/police-studies/what-place-police-within-criminal-justice-system/
Mirza, A. A. (2016). Delays and lapses in Pakistan's criminal justice system. London School of Economics and Political Science.
Rahman, M. M. C. (2013). A study on delay in the disposal of civil litigation: Bangladesh perspective. The International Journal of Social Sciences, 14(1), 27-35.
Radhakrishna, M. (2008). Crime of vigilante justice. Economic and Political Weekly, 43(2), 16-18.
Shah, R. U., Shadi, U. K., & Sumera, F. (2014). Causes for delay in civil justice in lower courts of Pakistan: A review. Pakistan Journal of Criminology, 6(1), 47-67.
Syed Sikandar Shah v. Inspector General Police Peshawar [2008] PCR.LJ 25, H.C, P. 29b.
White, M. A. (1925). Trials in England. California Law Review, 13, 304. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38T22W
Arshad, S. J. (2017, February 15). The criminal justice system in Pakistan: A critical analysis. Dawn.
Asad, M. (2018, January 21). Over 1.8 million cases pending in Pakistan's courts. Dawn.
Roberts, N. F. (2023, November 29). What is medical tourism? Traveling for healthcare explained. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/nicoleroberts/2023/11/29/what-is-medical-tourism-traveling-for-healthcare-explained/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Rohina Malik, Beenish Aslam Shaikh
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b67b2/b67b296c4d3b028c918eaf7bf864d9ab589a7b44" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.